Nice sleuthing! So it's quite a recent change. It stands out to me that the items up top (faves, acct, etc.) which already had icons also got emojified.
Prior to that, they had already introduced emojis to draw attention to their Craigslist charitable fund: that probably made this a much easier decision.
xnx 2 days ago [-]
I like it.
Good user experience isn't about dogmatically sticking to "text only", but about making a useful, understandable, navigable site.
Emojis seem to help section the dozens of links on the homepage without adding unnecessary visual distraction or page payload.
argee 2 days ago [-]
> unnecessary visual distraction
I think I personally see emojis used in this manner as unnecessary visual distraction, because it detracts from whatever self-consistent design system you had going on (when used for high visibility items like front page headings). Emojis don't even render the same on every platform, so its a move that dilutes your design language.
Even if it's a useful visual guide, I would wager nine times out of ten you'd be better off with a self-consistent icon set...depending on what you're going for, of course.
OkayPhysicist 2 days ago [-]
The page uses 'font-family: sans-serif'. They've already given up on any control over what the page looks like. They leave it up to the browser, which, IMO, more sites should do.
jey 10 hours ago [-]
> Emojis don't even render the same on every platform
This is a feature, not a bug. That it's using your platform-specific emojis makes it easier to scan, since it's the ideograms you are already accustomed to. Much faster to scan familiar symbols than to read each section heading serially.
xnx 2 days ago [-]
Sites having individual "design language" is part of the problem that got us to the current balkanized web.
krapp 5 hours ago [-]
It isn't a problem. Site authors being able to choose their own design is fundamental to the web, it is as much a platform for personal creative expression as it is information. Not everything has to look like a whitepaper.
dieselgate 2 days ago [-]
Interesting, it even uses the clippy emoji for resumes!
I think OP is reading into it too much , it seems like a minor embellishment and I never personally correlated emojis with LLMs.
Gualdrapo 2 days ago [-]
Yup, the association with LLMs is a bit odd, since there's emojis everywhere in mainstream digital comunication way before the big hit of the ai stuff.
Without seeing how it looked before I think this just gives a little bit more of clue about what each category is about. They are still being used sparsely.
The only thing where it irks me to find emojis is in cli apps. They use to not be the same character width as the monofont I use so they either look chopped or they displace their nearing text.
dinkleberg 9 hours ago [-]
Which logically makes sense. LLMs wouldn't have invented the pattern, it would have been learned as a common pattern in the training material.
argee 2 days ago [-]
I wouldn't find it remarkable anywhere else, but Craigslist has built a reputation on not doing this kind of thing.
Grombobulous 2 days ago [-]
I wouldn't say so.
I would say it's actually exactly the kind of thing they would do - stick with plain text over things that load slower like images.
Emojis are great for that, they're plain unicode text!
argee 2 days ago [-]
So, why now? Emojis have existed for a while, haven't they? Whereas Craigslist has been using images up until now (at least for the top nav items).
Grombobulous 2 days ago [-]
Craigslist has stayed very small in employee count, so I imagine someone was playing around with it and the team just agreed that they liked it.
hk__2 10 hours ago [-]
As long as emojis are used as an _addition_ to text labels I think this is a good thing. The problem arises when they are used _instead_ of labels, although that’s a problem that predates emojis, it’s common with normal icons.
If you design an interface when some actions are only behind icons/emojis (no text, no hover title), expect users like me to click on them just to see what they do.
SoftTalker 10 hours ago [-]
Yeah just as an adddion to the main groupings it's not terrible. The actual emojis used are not very good. It's unclear to me what several of them are or why they represent the group title.
K7PJP 9 hours ago [-]
> people are beginning to feel emoji fatigue
Are they? News to me. I like them. Do they show up in Lynx or whatever terminal-based browser the hip kids are using these day are using?
kevin_thibedeau 8 hours ago [-]
Lynx won't render the page. Links doesn't show them.
pcrh 9 hours ago [-]
This prompted me to check out rental rates in my old haunt of Inner Sunset. I remember the Craigslist offices on 9th and Judah...
It's shocking that a 1 bedroom apartment now rents for $4-5k/month....
dgellow 9 hours ago [-]
You’re completely over reacting and might need to spend some time relaxing with other humans
digitaltrees 9 hours ago [-]
I am going to start using "might need to spend time relaxing with other humans"...brilliant.
Would have been nice when they had casual encounters - eggplant, water droplets, tongue peach.
onetokeoverthe 5 hours ago [-]
[dead]
0x38B 6 hours ago [-]
I noticed emojis in the top-right corner the other day; I thought, “oh, that’s interesting”, and continued browsing – even though Indeed has more jobs, like Marketplace (1) has more for sale, I far prefer Craigslist for being simple and easy-to-navigate.
1: How many people don’t delete Facebook because of it? When I left Facebook for good, losing access to Marketplace felt like a real sacrifice.
It was worse in a rural village here in Alaska, where everything was on Facebook, much to my dismay. But the upside of a small community is that I heard about things anyway via word-of-mouth.
9 hours ago [-]
didntcheck 10 hours ago [-]
> how do you feel about the entire thing?
I feel about as strongly as I do about the font that Google use
I will never understand this visceral reaction that emojis provoke in some people
loughnane 9 hours ago [-]
oh, it looks like they changed the URLs tool. I used to be able to go to a subdomain like boston.craigslist.org. Now it redirects to www.craigslist.org/area/boston
willcmcc 9 hours ago [-]
nah the worst part is they moved boats from for sale -> auto. threw off my whole flow
dgellow 9 hours ago [-]
What’s your flow, if you don’t mind? Are you often looking at boats? Just curious
willcmcc 8 hours ago [-]
I browse listings for boats and musical instruments more often than I'd like to admit. I live in a town with lots of boats and I've sailed my whole life, so I like to browse listings and dream that maybe one day I'll find a steal.
jw-open 9 hours ago [-]
Maybe it is from a coding agent. And the maintainer has no reason to remove it as it looks ok.
mock-possum 5 hours ago [-]
“Emoji Fatigue??” It’s a little late for that. Emojis are normal now. They’re to be expected. They’re here to stay, forever.
Language has shifted. It’s ridiculous to try to pretend it’s upsetting it even novel at this point.
What’s really odd is places that specifically don’t support emojis nowadays.
Prior to that, they had already introduced emojis to draw attention to their Craigslist charitable fund: that probably made this a much easier decision.
Good user experience isn't about dogmatically sticking to "text only", but about making a useful, understandable, navigable site.
Emojis seem to help section the dozens of links on the homepage without adding unnecessary visual distraction or page payload.
I think I personally see emojis used in this manner as unnecessary visual distraction, because it detracts from whatever self-consistent design system you had going on (when used for high visibility items like front page headings). Emojis don't even render the same on every platform, so its a move that dilutes your design language.
Even if it's a useful visual guide, I would wager nine times out of ten you'd be better off with a self-consistent icon set...depending on what you're going for, of course.
This is a feature, not a bug. That it's using your platform-specific emojis makes it easier to scan, since it's the ideograms you are already accustomed to. Much faster to scan familiar symbols than to read each section heading serially.
I think OP is reading into it too much , it seems like a minor embellishment and I never personally correlated emojis with LLMs.
Without seeing how it looked before I think this just gives a little bit more of clue about what each category is about. They are still being used sparsely.
The only thing where it irks me to find emojis is in cli apps. They use to not be the same character width as the monofont I use so they either look chopped or they displace their nearing text.
I would say it's actually exactly the kind of thing they would do - stick with plain text over things that load slower like images.
Emojis are great for that, they're plain unicode text!
If you design an interface when some actions are only behind icons/emojis (no text, no hover title), expect users like me to click on them just to see what they do.
Are they? News to me. I like them. Do they show up in Lynx or whatever terminal-based browser the hip kids are using these day are using?
It's shocking that a 1 bedroom apartment now rents for $4-5k/month....
1: How many people don’t delete Facebook because of it? When I left Facebook for good, losing access to Marketplace felt like a real sacrifice.
It was worse in a rural village here in Alaska, where everything was on Facebook, much to my dismay. But the upside of a small community is that I heard about things anyway via word-of-mouth.
I feel about as strongly as I do about the font that Google use
I will never understand this visceral reaction that emojis provoke in some people
Language has shifted. It’s ridiculous to try to pretend it’s upsetting it even novel at this point.
What’s really odd is places that specifically don’t support emojis nowadays.